(no subject)
Jan. 14th, 2010 12:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
IS there a...cliche, or a trope or a syndrome that states all essentially smart secondary characters must be made to look like complete idiots so the jackass main character can come in and show off how smart he is? I'm talking specifically about Lassiter and Wilson. Both are in their 30's, yet one's the head of the entire oncology department in a major teaching hospital, one's the head detective of a police precinct. That didn't happen by magic, they have to pretty pretty smart and capable right? Then why are they always made to look dumb at their very profession so House and Shawn can come in and save the day? I might be the only one who's annoyed by this >.>
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:17 pm (UTC)My favorite: "THE AIRWOLF JACKET RESCUING FAKE PSYCHIC"
Also, I may say this, "I'M BUTTCRAZY IN LOVE WITH LASSIE." about someone, regardless of the looks I will no doubt get.
I can't keep up with the 200 comments though!
The things, the incompetent Lassie is more of a cliche for the actual show, the ficcers treat him better for goodness sake!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 11:45 pm (UTC)and I do see what you mean about what the writers do to him at times.
(Oh and ps. Just in case you haven't seen that site before, watch out. It is a RUTHLESS timewasting machine...)
xoxoxoxoxox
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 05:26 am (UTC)I get Wilson is supposed to be The Watson and kind of the foil to House, but then why make him so important, i.e. his position in the hospital? That's what I don't get. I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 05:30 am (UTC)It's one of those "your mileage may vary" things, I think. Plus, even though I'm not a huge fan of them, a lot of fandom loves Castle's family (his mom & his daughter).
no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 06:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 05:31 am (UTC)I saw a review (video review) of Sherlock Holmes (the new movie) and the reviewer said that it had the best portrayal of Watson because for once they didn't make Watson look like a dumbass in order to prove or show how smart Holmes was.
Besides if Wilson and Lassiter are considered "dumb", then House and Shawn can't be that smart. :)
If they devalue the secondary characters, they're also devaluing the main character in the process.
I hope I made sense.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 06:20 am (UTC)Ha, that's true. I just wish we'd see why Lassie and Wilson are supposed to be the wunderkinds they're made out to be. You made sense, definitely. I don't know why the writers think this is a valid way to the main characters look better.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-16 12:36 pm (UTC)I haven't seen the new Sherlock Holmes movie or any of the tv/movie incarnations of Sherlock Holmes. I've only read or listened to reviews that have said this is the best portrayal of Watson that they've seen.
I've only read all the SH books written by Doyle.